Objectives of CT and PT — and Why Metering and Protection CTs Are Different

Author: Abloom Instruction Date: November 07, 2026

Relays and meters cannot be connected directly to a 132 kV line carrying thousands of amperes. Instrument transformers — the current transformer (CT) and the potential transformer (PT) — stand between the power circuit and the instruments. This post explains what they are for, and why a power system needs two different kinds of CT: one for metering and one for protection.

Objectives of CT and PT

(1) Scale reduction and standardisation. A CT steps a high transmission current (hundreds or thousands of amperes) down to a standardised low value — 1 A or 5 A — and a PT steps a high voltage (kV) down to 110 V line-to-line. These standard low values suit ordinary low-cost relays and energy meters, so one meter design works on any system voltage.

(2) Galvanic isolation and safety. The secondary circuit is electrically isolated from the high-voltage primary. Control panels, protective relays and human operators are therefore kept away from hazardous primary voltages.

Why two different CTs?

A metering CT and a protection CT do opposite jobs, so their cores are built differently:

FeatureMetering CTProtection CT
JobAccurate measurement of normal load current for billingFaithful reproduction of fault current for relays
Accuracy classVery high — 0.1 to 0.5Moderate — e.g. Class 5P20
Working rangeNormal load only — 5% to 120% of rated currentLinear during severe faults — 10 to 30× rated current
Core materialHigh-permeability nickel-iron (permalloy / mumetal)Grain-oriented silicon steel, larger cross-section
Saturation behaviourLow saturation flux density — Instrument Security Factor, ISF < 5. The core saturates early on purpose, so the secondary current cannot rise proportionally during a fault and delicate meter coils are protected from thermal burnoutHigh saturation knee-point voltage — Accuracy Limit Factor, ALF = 10 to 20. The core does not saturate during faults, so the relay receives an accurate replica of the fault current


Figure 2.1: Metering CT vs protection CT — saturation behaviour. The metering CT saturates early (ISF < 5) to protect instruments; the protection CT stays linear to 10–30× rated current (ALF 10–20, e.g. 5P20). (Schematic, not to scale.)

The two behaviours are deliberate opposites. A metering CT that stayed linear during a fault would drive a huge secondary current through a delicate energy meter and burn its coils out. A protection CT that saturated during a fault would feed the relay a flattened, wrong current — the relay would under-measure the fault and might fail to trip. One CT cannot do both jobs, so both types are installed side by side.

Key points to remember

  • CTs step current down to 1 A or 5 A and PTs step voltage down to 110 V, and both give galvanic isolation from the HV primary.
  • Metering CT: accuracy class 0.1–0.5, range 5–120%, nickel-iron core, ISF < 5 — saturates early to protect meters.
  • Protection CT: linear at 10–30× rated current, grain-oriented silicon steel, ALF 10–20 (e.g. Class 5P20) — must not saturate during faults.
  • Early saturation is a feature in a metering CT and a failure in a protection CT.

Based on Power System Protection & Switchgear, Complete Examination Solution, Exam 07 May 2026, Q2(a).